
Decoding the New Section 301 Tariff Rules
New tariffs introduce a complex web of country-specific exemptions and HTS classifications that could significantly increase compliance work for sourcing
SOURCING | FTAs
/ Tariff elimination narrows the cost gap with Bangladesh and Turkey, but rules of origin, sustainability, and lead times will determine who benefits.
India’s new FTA with the EU removes the core tariff handicap Indian textiles and garments have faced, but benefits phase in with a lag and are tightly conditioned on rules of origin and sustainability, so competitive impacts will emerge over several years rather than in the next few quarters.
In the near term, there is a transition period since GSP suspension raises effective tariffs through 2028 until the FTA actually kicks in.
Exporters face a “year-plus” of elevated duties and increased compliance costs due to the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), particularly affecting steel, aluminum, and textiles, which may cause industry consolidation.
This could pressure weaker firms and accelerate consolidation.
The agreement also requires approval from the Council of the European Union, consent from the European Parliament, and completion of domestic procedures in India.
There are clear big wins for India, but also some serious challenges.
To continue reading, please login
Related articles

New tariffs introduce a complex web of country-specific exemptions and HTS classifications that could significantly increase compliance work for sourcing

Section 301 tariffs threaten to add one more layer of complexity to an already complex trade environment.

Proposed Section 301 tariffs targeting 60 countries could reshape sourcing economics across many of the apparel industry’s largest production hubs.
Insights & Analysis